TOWN OF
CHARLTON
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting
of October 10, 2006
Applicant: Michelle Cuchelo
Applicant
Address: 71 Deer Spray
Drive, Clifton Park, NY 12065
Case No.: 06-09
Parcel Tax Map
No.: 235.00-1-33.1
Relief
Requested: Area Variance
Notice of
Publication: Daily Gazette,
September 1, 2006
Date/Time Public
Hearing: September 12, 2006 - 7:45 p.m.
Location: Charlton
Historical Society Building
Maple Avenue, Charlton, NY
MOTION
AND RESOLUTION regarding Michelle Cuchelo application for a single lot area
variance and as shown on a survey entitled “Subdivision of Lands n/f of
Michelle Cuchelo, Book 1735, Page 556", prepared by Northeast Land Survey
& Land Development Consultants, P.C., dated June 23, 2006 and amended July
24, 2006.
PROCEDURES
1. The Charlton Zoning Board of Appeals
received an application from Michelle Cuchelo dated July 25, 2006 with respect
to Parcel Tax Map No. 235.00-1-33.1, being located on Sacandaga Road (State
Highway 147) in the Town of Charlton, Saratoga County, New York. The parcel is located in a Residential
Agricultural District as determined by the Town of Charlton Zoning Law. The parcel is shown on the above-referenced
survey and is part of a proposed four lot subdivision.
2. The application requested an area
variance. The application addressed the
area variance and included an attached tax map of the parcel and the names and
addresses of the required neighbors to be notified of the public hearing, the
aforementioned survey of the four lot subdivision, a short environmental
assessment form and a two page summary of the applicant’s rationale for the
requested relief.
3. A public hearing was held at 7:45 p.m. at
the Charlton Historical Society Building on September 12, 2006. The Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals
acknowledged all documentation received with respect to the application,
including letters from the Charlton Planning Board and the Charlton
Environmental Conservation Commission.
There was acknowledgment of a letter received from Mr. Harold Zeliger,
owner of a neighboring parcel. The
applicant, through her attorney David Pentkowski, made a presentation with
respect to the requested area variance.
The Zoning Board of Appeals received public hearing input from several
neighbors and other Charlton residents regarding the application. The public hearing was then adjourned in
order to further consider the application and information presented.
4. The Zoning Board of Appeals was concerned
about certain issues related to the application. The Zoning Board of Appeals indicated to the applicant that
additional consideration would be required, including a visit to the site by
the Board and that following the adjourning of the public hearing, the Board
determined to reconvene the matter at this October 10 meeting.
5. It was acknowledged during the public
hearing that a subdivision application that involved the lot for which the area
variance is requested has been filed with the Charlton Planning Board. The Charlton Planning Board designated
itself lead agency with respect to procedures required by the State Environmental
Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The Zoning
Board of Appeals undertook no consideration of any SEQRA issues.
6. The Board then met on October 10, 2006 for a
continuation of the public hearing, for further consideration of the Cuchelo
application and to receive additional information from the Charlton ECC and the
Charlton Town Engineer, Michael McNamara.
Following the closing of the public hearing, the Board considered the
five criteria for an area variance and rendered a decision in this matter.
FINDINGS OF
FACT and CONCLUSIONS AT LAW
The
Zoning Board of Appeals hereby finds the following facts with respect to the
referenced application:
1. All legal requirements with respect to the
processing of the application for an area variance by Michelle Cuchelo have
been complied with, including the filing of a completed application, proper
notification of all neighbors of the public hearing, conduct of the public
hearing on September 12 and October 10, Board consideration following the
closing of the public hearing on October 10 and final motion and resolution
regarding the requested area variance.
2. The minimum continuous lot frontage for a
residential building lot in a Residential Agricultural District is 200'. The lot subject to the area variance
application, designated as Lot 4 on the referenced subdivision survey, has 133'
of continuous road frontage.
3. Based on information provided to the Zoning
Board of Appeals by the applicant, the Board determined that the granting of
the area variance would not produce an undesirable change in the character of
the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed Lot 4 contains 16.05 acres,
which exceeds the Town of Charlton Residential Agricultural lot size minimum of
2 acres. It is proposed that a
residence be built on the lot at a location of over 900 feet easterly of
Sacandaga Road and at a location on the lot where there is approximately 670'
of lot width. The residence would not
be visible from Sacandaga Road and there is both a tree and land buffer between
the residence located on the adjoining Zeliger lot.
4. Based upon the information provided by the
applicant, the Board determined that the relief requested could not be achieved
by some other means.
5. Based upon the information provided by the
applicant, the Board determined that the requested variance was
substantial. As stated above, the
minimum required continuous frontage for a lot at this location is 200',
therefore, the deficiency of frontage is 67'.
This represents a deviation of almost 34% from the required road
frontage. However, the Board further
considered the facts that the lot has significant acreage well in excess of the
Zoning Law requirements and that at the house location site, the lot width is
also substantially greater (670' v. 200') than as required by the Zoning Law.
6. Based upon the information provided by the
applicant and others at the public hearing, the Board determined that a
granting of the area variance would not have an adverse effect or impact on the
physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. A buffer area of trees would exist between
the existing Zeliger residence and the proposed residence to be constructed on
Lot 4. The location of the new home
would also be located at a substantial distance easterly from Sacandaga Road,
thus continuing to maintain the general physical environment of the area in
which the proposed four lot subdivision would be located. Environmental issues raised during the
public hearing are under the jurisdiction of the Charlton Planning Board and do
not constitute a material issue in the consideration by the Zoning Board of
Appeals of this area variance.
7. Based upon information provided at the
public hearing, the Board determined that the alleged difficulty, namely the
deficient road frontage for Lot 4, was self created. At the time of the purchase of the subject property by the
applicant, the perimeter boundaries and the relationship of the north side of
the parcel with the Zeliger lot were known to the applicant.
8. During the public hearing, the Zoning Board
of Appeals heard comments and concerns from neighbors to this property. Concerns also were raised by other residents
of the Town of Charlton and including members of the Charlton Planning
Board. The Board considered the benefit
to the applicant if the variance was granted as weighed against the detriment,
if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such
grant.
NOW
ON MOTION OF Audrey Ketchum and seconded by Nilda Burke, the following
resolution is introduced for consideration by the Zoning Board of Appeals:
RESOLVED,
that the Zoning Board of Appeals approves the application of Michelle Cuchelo
for an area variance with respect to Lot 4 of a proposed subdivision and as
shown on a subdivision map referenced in this decision, and it is further
RESOLVED,
that this decision will be forwarded to the Charlton Planning Board and the
Town Clerk within three (3) calendar days.
FOR THE RESOLUTION:
Audrey Ketchum. Nilda Burke, Ed Malis and Mary Schmidt
AGAINST THE RESOLUTION: none
The Resolution is hereby approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Mary A Schmidt
Chairman, Charlton Zoning Board of Appeals