Meeting Minutes
Second Special Town
Board Meeting held April 14, 2004
This meeting was held at 1:00 P.M. on Thursday, April 15 at
the Town Hall.
Supervisor Acunto – This is the second Special Meeting of
the Town Board. We did not have Gail
here yesterday. I will take a minute or
two just to get things on the record so that everything is where it should
be. I will note that everyone is in
attendance except Bob Lippiello who is out of town. This was the same case yesterday. Bob was not in attendance but we did have two assessors here,
Marge Dennis, the Chairman of the Board and Vicki Hayner, an Assessor. The reason for the meeting yesterday that
was held at 10:00 A.M. was a request by Councilman Grattidge based on the
concerns and statements made at the Town Board Meeting on Monday evening. Alan asked if we could have a meeting as
soon as possible with the thought that documentation had to be in the County
yesterday. We did meet. We did have a long discussion. I cannot remember all of it and anybody can
add to it after I finish. What happened
at the end of this meeting was that the Town Board basically took a poll of the
four members present of what we thought was the way the assessors should
approach the Annual Reval. Program. The
question was to use the data supplied by the consultant or to use the date
achieved by the assessors or to disregard the rolls totally. We poll came out that two council people
said they would prefer to use the consultant’s figures, one council person said
to use the figures of the assessors and one council person said don’t use
either one --- leave it the way it is
and then we adjourned. We sat around
and bandied a little bit and we finally said we ought to check with counsel to
find out if what we just decided was appropriate. I called Bob and we left Bob with several things to research and
agreed to meet again this afternoon at 1:00 P.M. which brings us here to the
second meeting. I notified Gail. I notified The Gazette that we were having
this meeting and I also notified The Gazette yesterday afternoon of the
meeting. I couldn’t get to The Gazette
at 7:30 A.M. because nobody picks up the phone. I think that is a general summary. If I am missing anything that you think should be on the record,
I would like you to do that before we open this meeting to hearing from Bob.
Councilman Grattidge – I think at the opening of yesterday’s
meeting, I characterized it as a workshop meeting between the assessors and the
Town Board rather than a Special Board Meeting. That is the way I viewed yesterday’s meeting as just a workshop –
the dialogue with the assessors.
Knowing that the assessors are elected officials, they have the power to
sign the rolls as they see fit so it was just a general discussion about the
Annual Reassessment. We had previously
been scheduled to have a triennial reassessment where the rolls would be looked
at every three years. At the end of
last year, if my memory is correct, it was felt that we should have an annual
reassessment because of the way the market was acting at the time. We agreed to an annual reassessment. We hired Appraisal Consultants to come. They did spend three days with our tax
figures and, I believe the term is called “trending”. They worked on our rolls.
With a trending situation they are also doing some of the surrounding
towns using the same methods. That was
just a little bit more background on some of the discussion that we had
yesterday, as far as my point of view.
Supervisor Acunto – Dot, was that basically your recollection
of what we did yesterday?
Councilman Mitchell – Basically.
Councilman Verola – Yes, I think so. The suggestion that we gave the assessors
yesterday: I think there were two
recommendations to go with the Consultant’s recommendations, one councilman
suggested we go with the assessor’s numbers and the other councilman suggested
that we not do an annual reval. I don’t
think you mentioned it was suggested not to do an annual reval. just in case we
didn’t get that.
Supervisor Acunto – We had a conversation with Bob on the
speakerphone.
Bob VanVranken – My recollection as to what happened at your
meeting is somewhat irrelevant at this point in time.
Supervisor Acunto – I just want to put it on the
record. We are back here in session
again. We have asked Bob to do some
research. At this point I will open it
up to you and you can tell us what you were able to find out.
Bob VanVranken – As I go along let me restate the facts just
so we are very clear. I believe I was
charged with two things. One was trying
to determine what if any authority the Town Board had with respect to the issue
regarding the 2004 Assessment and, secondly, if the Town Board could pass a
resolution now, in affect, voiding what the resolution was last year with
respect to this annual reval. I think
the answers are clear and they are as follows.
First, the assessors have the sole and exclusive authority to determine
what the assessed value of the properties are in the Town of Charlton. The statute that gives the Town Board the
ability to fund an advisor or a company to assist in this process is under
Section 572 of the Real Property Tax Laws.
It is very short and I will give you all copies of this afterwards but
it is always safer not to have you reading it while we are talking. The governing body of any Town may employ
experts to appraise the value of real property therein, and then my emphasis, for the assistance of the assessors in the
assessment of real property and to give expert testimony in any action or
proceeding in connection with any such assessment. There have been some interesting cases on
this and the cases have basically validated the fact that this is advisory
only. It is not binding on anybody. It’s clearly not binding on the assessors
and that is intended merely to supplement and assist and be accepted as part of
the information base for the assessors but they have absolute authority to
accept, reject or modify in part, or in whole, anything they receive from this
entity. Clearly the assessors are
separate and independent of the Town Board.
The Town Board has no authority to direct the assessors to do anything
with respect to the assessed value of the Town. The only authority relates to the appropriation of money to pay
for additional assistance that may relate to this particular issue. As I understand the two questions, the
answers are:
1.
The assessors are the sole determiners of the assessed value for 2004
and it is their decision and judgement exclusively as to whether or not they
want to accept, reject or modify the so called supplemental information that
they received from the aforementioned Appraisal Consultants.
2. The assessors have, again, the sole
authority to determine what that assessed value is here today. It would be void, as a matter of law, for
this Town Board to pass any resolution that made anything retroactive.
Councilman Grattidge – In other words, to rescind an annual
update, that’s not even an option?
Bob VanVranken – That’s right.
Supervisor Acunto – One thing I discovered after we had
decided to adjourn yesterday was that, in fact, the assessors have used the
data supplied by Appraisal Consultants in arriving at part of your final
role. Is that correct? There really isn’t two numbers?
Marge Dennis – No, there is not two numbers. (could not understand) operating the
computer program for us and running the models and (could not understand)
system on it which we don’t have the knowledge of doing or didn’t have at that
time so that was part of their consulting fee as well, running the programs on
our system. That was part of the
collection of data, like Mr. VanVranken stated. We used it. We considered
it. It wasn’t like (could not
understand) It is part of our
database. It is inclusive of
everything.
Councilman Verola – So what you are telling us is that we
are stuck with the annual reval. forever?
We can never change that? Can we
change it next year when we do our……………
Bob VanVranken – What you can do is indicate to the
assessors that you are not willing to support consultant assistance and I am
not sure, realistically, that that annual reval. is possible without that. I don’t know that. That is a decision, again, to be made by the assessors.
Supervisor Acunto – Sandy raises a good question. Exclude the use of the consultants. The assessors feel they can continue without
the use of a consultant, can they do an annual reval?
Bob VanVranken – Sure.
Supervisor Acunto – Without any permission from us or
authority from us?
Bob VanVranken – They don’t need any. Section 500 states that the assessors are in
charge of assessing the properties in the towns.
Supervisor Acunto – But we call it an annual reval.
Bob VanVranken – You call it anything you want. Annual reval. really is a term of art. It isn’t technical.
Supervisor Acunto – We get compensation from ORPS for Annual
Reval.
Vicki Hayner – Annual update.
Supervisor Acunto – Who is making that decision? Is it the Board of Assessors or the
town? I’m not sure.
Vicki Hayner – We submit the paperwork.
Supervisor Acunto – It is your decision then.
Vicki Hayner – But let me say that we know what the law
states in that this is our job and we have the right to do that. We aren’t sitting here saying, “We have the
right. We are going to do what we
want”. We have been trying to work with
the Board and be respectful of the town.
Councilman Grattidge – And that was the spirit of the
meeting yesterday. There was a dialogue
to state different positions.
Vicki Hayner – Correct.
Councilman Mitchell – I think that covers it pretty
well. I was well aware that assessing
is the job of the assessors.
Supervisor Acunto – We wish the assessors well and I don’t
mean that sarcastically in any way. It
will be an interesting May and June.
After everyone spoke who wished the meeting was adjourned at
1:20 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Gail
Hanchar
Town
Clerk